| To: | ppetru@xxxxxxxxxx (Petru Paler) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: syncookie monsters ? |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Fri, 16 Feb 2001 22:36:52 +0300 (MSK) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20010216210024.B1900@ppetru.net> from "Petru Paler" at Feb 16, 1 10:15:00 pm |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > So, what is the actual truth ? Are syncookies good to use for > loaded servers ? Provided server is configured so that sending cookies is never triggered and considering each event of triggering syncookies as sign of misconfiguration rather than an attack. So, they are good when used with care (despite of their inventor is either cretin or plain cad) Alexey |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | syncookie monsters ?, Petru Paler |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: syncookie monsters ?, Petru Paler |
| Previous by Thread: | syncookie monsters ?, Petru Paler |
| Next by Thread: | Re: syncookie monsters ?, Petru Paler |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |