| To: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.4.1: TCP assertion failed |
| From: | Petru Paler <ppetru@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 15 Feb 2001 20:29:08 +0200 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200102151825.VAA19838@ms2.inr.ac.ru>; from kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru on Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 09:25:49PM +0300 |
| References: | <20010215171445.A2327@ppetru.net> <200102151825.VAA19838@ms2.inr.ac.ru> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.14i |
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 09:25:49PM +0300, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > KERNEL: assertion (tp->lost_out == 0) failed at > > tcp_input.c(1202):tcp_remove_reno_sacks > > This is harmless. Ok. > > (between lots of "TCP: peer xxxx shrinks window xxxx:xxx:xxxxxx. Bad, what > > else > > can I say?" which I understand are harmless) > > And this is not harmless. If you can identify client shrinking window, > please, do this. Identify, what ? Do you want me to paste the actual numbers (I've got plenty of them in all my web and mail server logs). -- Petru Paler, mailto:ppetru@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.ppetru.net - ICQ: 41817235 |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 2.4.1: TCP assertion failed, kuznet |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 2.4.1: TCP assertion failed, kuznet |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2.4.1: TCP assertion failed, kuznet |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 2.4.1: TCP assertion failed, kuznet |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |