| To: | Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: netlink drops messages. |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 17 Jan 2001 12:06:52 +0100 |
| Cc: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20010117101720.F5122@nbase.co.il>; from gleb@nbase.co.il on Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 09:19:45AM +0100 |
| References: | <20010116200600.C5122@nbase.co.il> <200101161828.VAA31502@ms2.inr.ac.ru> <20010117101720.F5122@nbase.co.il> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 09:19:45AM +0100, Gleb Natapov wrote: > On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 09:28:34PM +0300, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > Hello! > > > > > Resync should be an exception and not the rule IMO. > > > > If in your system simultaneous UP of 100 interfaces is not an exception. 8) > Forget about interfaces :). Suppose I have BGP router with 100.000 prefixes on > one interface. When interface goes UP my router daemon adds all this prefixes > to the kernel. This will generate burst of netlink messages right? Netlink sendmsg does flow control based on the buffer. -Andi -- This is like TV. I don't like TV. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: routable interfaces, Gleb Natapov |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: netlink drops messages., Andi Kleen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: netlink drops messages., Gleb Natapov |
| Next by Thread: | Re: netlink drops messages., Gleb Natapov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |