| To: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx (jamal) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Mon, 15 Jan 2001 21:17:40 +0300 (MSK) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.GSO.4.30.0101142243300.12354-100000@shell.cyberus.ca> from "jamal" at Jan 14, 1 10:47:47 pm |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > I'll send you my hacked ttcp in another mail. Maybe i am screwing > something ... I do not think that the problem is in ttcp. The number, which you showed are so crazy, that this cannot be explained by breakage there. > sorry, earlier means in the case where no ZC patch These numbers contradict to numbers, which you sent in previous report. Please, redo your test recording the conditions accurately. 8) Well, and check your kernel configuration, Probbaly, you did something silly sort of enabling netfilter. Alexey |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | 802.1Q VLAN kernel patch 1.0.0 released., Ben Greear |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: routable interfaces, kuznet |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Is sendfile all that sexy?, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Is sendfile all that sexy?, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |