| To: | Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!) |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 7 Jan 2001 04:29:59 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <3A578F27.D2A9DF52@candelatech.com>; from greearb@candelatech.com on Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 02:33:27PM -0700 |
| References: | <3A578F27.D2A9DF52@candelatech.com> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 02:33:27PM -0700, Ben Greear wrote: > I'm hoping that I can get a few comments on this code. It was added > to (significantly) speed up things like 'ifconfig -a' when running with > 4000 or so VLAN devices. It should also help other instances with lots > of (virtual) devices, like FrameRelay, ATM, and possibly virtual IP > interfaces. It probably won't help 'normal' users much, and in it's final > form, should probably be a selectable option in the config process. > > Anyway, let me know what you think! Does it make any significant different with the ifconfig from newest nettools? I removed a quadratic algorithm from ifconfig's device parsing, and with that I was able to display a few thousand alias devices on a unpatched kernel in reasonable time. -Andi |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), Chris Wedgwood |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: routable interfaces, Gleb Natapov |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |