| To: | eis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Henner Eisen) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: migrating to lock_sock() |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Tue, 19 Dec 2000 18:16:53 +0300 (MSK) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200012182206.XAA03137@baty.hanse.de> from "Henner Eisen" at Dec 19, 0 01:45:01 am |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > buffer space. Should I also do so for X.25 or would it make sense to > rework sock_alloc_send_skb() such that socket lock is released while > waiting for write buffer space? sock_alloc_send_skb() is stateless, there is no lock to release. If your protocol uses socket lock, you cannot use this function. Alexey |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: skb_linearize needs fixing?, kuznet |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: alignment issues on netif_rx, Jes Sorensen |
| Previous by Thread: | migrating to lock_sock(), Henner Eisen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: migrating to lock_sock(), Henner Eisen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |