Re: BUG in tcp.c ?

To:	davem@xxxxxxxxxx (David S. Miller)
Subject:	Re: BUG in tcp.c ?
From:	kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date:	Sun, 8 Oct 2000 21:13:24 +0400 (MSK DST)
Cc:	netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<200010080032.RAA02467@pizda.ninka.net> from "David S. Miller" at Oct 7, 0 05:32:14 pm
Sender:	owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx

Hello!

> Regardless, having TCP ignore sk->allocation yet datagram sockets
> respect it is a real bug.

No doubts. Though I would prefer not to see sk->allocation at all.

I simply felt important to warn. Some recent report about nfs
showed that people really call sendmsg from bhs.

Alexey

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
BUG in tcp.c ?, Rik van Riel Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, David S. Miller Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, Marcelo Tosatti Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, David S. Miller Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, kuznet Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, Andi Kleen Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, kuznet Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, Marcelo Tosatti Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, David S. Miller Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, kuznet <= Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, Henner Eisen Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, Rik van Riel Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, kuznet Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, Rik van Riel Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, kuznet Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, Henner Eisen Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, David S. Miller Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, kuznet Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, Marcelo Tosatti Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, kuznet

Previous by Date:	Wavelan busted in 2.4.test9?, Ben Greear
Next by Date:	Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, Marcelo Tosatti
Previous by Thread:	Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, David S. Miller
Next by Thread:	Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, Henner Eisen
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]