netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: BUG in tcp.c ?

from [David S. Miller] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: riel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: BUG in tcp.c ?
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 15:16:33 -0700
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0010061917420.13585-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva> (message from Rik van Riel on Fri, 6 Oct 2000 19:25:38 -0300 (BRST))
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0010061917420.13585-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx 
   Date:   Fri, 6 Oct 2000 19:25:38 -0300 (BRST)
   From: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

   Is this an actual bug, or am I overlooking something?

It is a bug and I'll change TCP's sendmsg to use sk->allocation as it
should.  Thanks for pointing this out.

Later,
David S. Miller
davem@xxxxxxxxxx
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  BUG in tcp.c ?, Rik van Riel
Next by Date:  Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, Marcelo Tosatti
Previous by Thread:  BUG in tcp.c ?, Rik van Riel
Next by Thread:  Re: BUG in tcp.c ?, Marcelo Tosatti
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]