netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: PATCH 2.4.0.9.2: export ethtool interface

To: Andrew Morton <andrewm@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: PATCH 2.4.0.9.2: export ethtool interface
From: Richard Gooch <rgooch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 13:41:55 -0600
Cc: "howling@xxxxxxxx" <havanna_moon@xxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <39C9F22F.E57BF151@uow.edu.au>
References: <39C883CF.9FB262FC@uow.edu.au> <39C5D263.8DA31C03@mandrakesoft.com> <39C75CB6.E86C55F@uow.edu.au> <008101c02276$fe4fc5a0$1cac243e@dustin> <200009201612.e8KGC6x14517@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> <39C9F22F.E57BF151@uow.edu.au>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Andrew Morton writes:
> Richard Gooch wrote:
> > 
> > Andrew Morton writes:
> > > But if someone is setting up a multi-node HA system or a router,
> > > it's not unreasonable to expect them to fork out the $$$ for a NIC
> > > which generates link status change interrupts, and to be prepared to
> > > use twisted pair.
> > 
> > Such as the 3c59x?
> 
> Yep. 3c905B. 905C and most of the Cardbus NICs.
> 
> I don't know how useful the whole link-state-change-interrupt thing
> is in practice.  The HA guys would, I suspect, say "thanks very
> much" and continue to use application-level heartbeating, as they
> should.

It's not just HA guys. Mobile users can use this too: "oh, the link
died, let's shut down the interface" and "hey, the link is back up,
let's tell bootpclient to ask for a new lease".

> We (I) need to ask them, and verify that there is actually a use for
> this interface before running away and coding stuff.

There is a use.

                                Regards,

                                        Richard....
Permanent: rgooch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Current:   rgooch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>