| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: PATCH 2.4.0.9.2: export ethtool interface |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 21 Sep 2000 14:30:42 +0200 |
| Cc: | ak@xxxxxx, andrewm@xxxxxxxxxx, becker@xxxxxxxxx, havanna_moon@xxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200009211159.EAA09358@pizda.ninka.net>; from davem@redhat.com on Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 02:12:25PM +0200 |
| References: | <39C883CF.9FB262FC@uow.edu.au> <Pine.LNX.4.10.10009201152510.1031-100000@vaio.greennet> <39C9F123.D8FA4F68@uow.edu.au> <20000921133302.36264@colin.muc.de> <200009211159.EAA09358@pizda.ninka.net> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 02:12:25PM +0200, David S. Miller wrote: > From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx> > Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 13:33:02 +0200 > > There is (2.4.0test9pre2): > > Andi, mind taking a quick peek at net/socket.c:sock_ioctl() :-) I hadn't expected such stupid code to survive in 2.4 @) Looks rather wastefull. How about adding a inode or file flag for that ? Also I would propose to run dev->do_ioctl and probably other device methods inside the BKL, they are not performance critical anyways and it is much safer. -Andi -- This is like TV. I don't like TV. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: PATCH 2.4.0.9.2: export ethtool interface, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: PATCH 2.4.0.9.2: export ethtool interface, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: PATCH 2.4.0.9.2: export ethtool interface, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: PATCH 2.4.0.9.2: export ethtool interface, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |