| To: | matthias.andree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: No Bug: accept discards socket options/O_NONBLOCK |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 15 Sep 2000 07:01:32 -0700 |
| Cc: | linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20000915155731.A8677@emma1.emma.line.org> (message from Matthias Andree on Fri, 15 Sep 2000 15:57:32 +0200) |
| References: | <20000915150125.A8057@emma1.emma.line.org> <200009151254.FAA09729@pizda.ninka.net> <20000915155731.A8677@emma1.emma.line.org> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 15:57:32 +0200 From: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> However, this makes Linux incompatible with *BSD and Solaris, so I'm wondering what this "break existing programs" would be, portable programs would most likely not break by the API change. Every Linux inetd in the world would instantly stop working. The behavior is not changing, lets end this thread right now. Later, David S. Miller davem@xxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: No Bug: accept discards socket options/O_NONBLOCK, Matthias Andree |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Preallocated skb's?, Bogdan Costescu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: No Bug: accept discards socket options/O_NONBLOCK, Matthias Andree |
| Next by Thread: | Re: No Bug: accept discards socket options/O_NONBLOCK, Raul Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |