| To: | lpetande@xxxxxxxxxx (Lars Henrik Petander) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Adding of destination options in IPv6 |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Wed, 12 Jul 2000 20:36:41 +0400 (MSK DST) |
| Cc: | stefan.schlott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.SOL.4.10.10007121149150.15093-100000@morphine.tcm.hut.fi> from "Lars Henrik Petander" at Jul 12, 0 11:56:39 am |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > but it does provide benefits to > network operators by decreasing the load on their network. Sorry. Introducing perturbations to data stream never resulted in saving something and never will. Piggybacking works when it does not harm data stream. If it does, it is made with control protocols. It is ABC of networking, programming etc. Alexey |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Adding of destination options in IPv6, kuznet |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] Turn off tw_recycle, Andi Kleen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Adding of destination options in IPv6, Lars Henrik Petander |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Adding of destination options in IPv6, kuznet |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |