| To: | Andrew Morton <andrewm@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: modular net drivers, take 2 |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 21 Jun 2000 12:21:23 +0200 |
| Cc: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx>, "netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <39500F81.46F5A826@uow.edu.au>; from Andrew Morton on Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 02:44:03AM +0200 |
| References: | <39500F81.46F5A826@uow.edu.au> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 02:44:03AM +0200, Andrew Morton wrote: > Andi Kleen wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 02:04:35PM +0200, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > > - sys_ioctl() and sys_delete_module() both already claim > > > the big lock, so where's the race anyway? I feel I'm missing > > > something.. > > > > Ugh, I missed that. Ok, with that there is no race. Even better :-) > > I think I lied. Look at this: Ok. Just let's hope that no non-ioctl function grabs first a different lock (like the rtnl_lock) and then does a lock_kernel(). That would give a nice deadlock race. -Andi -- This is like TV. I don't like TV. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: modular net drivers, take 2, Andrew Morton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: modular net drivers, take 2, Andrew Morton |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: modular net drivers, take 2, Andrew Morton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: modular net drivers, Rusty Russell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |