| To: | dancer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Tres Hofmeister <tres@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [vortex, eepro100] True on TRANSMIT ERROR TIMEOUT |
| From: | Andrey Savochkin <saw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 16 Jun 2000 10:55:56 +0800 |
| Cc: | netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <3949654F.958B1718@zeor.simegen.com>; from "dancer@zeor.simegen.com" on Fri, Jun 16, 2000 at 09:22:55AM |
| References: | <39461BB3.299DD807@uow.edu.au> <Pine.LNX.4.10.10006141420380.370-100000@kenzo.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de> <39483426.B07E4BA@uow.edu.au> <20000615161933.I30376@nob.rap.ucar.edu> <3949654F.958B1718@zeor.simegen.com> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello,
On Fri, Jun 16, 2000 at 09:22:55AM +1000, dancer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Tres Hofmeister wrote:
[snip]
> > I *never* thought I'd be fighting off our NT pushers because
> > our Linux web server seemed unreliable... :( Oh, well.
>
> Here, also, though we're running a complete range of services for a million
> or so people. Does that count as 'enterprise'?. We got over
> all-too-frequent kernel panics by replacing our vortex cards with
> eepro100's. It's hard to justify another hardware switch to our partners,
> who have been pushing Sun or NT for the last several years. Of course, our
> third choice for cards would have been tulips. :/
You definitely will have problems defending the choice of Linux instead of
Sun and NT. That's because you do not take actions.
Have you ever considered to report your problems, help developers to debug
your case?
Regards
Andrey V.
Savochkin
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [vortex, eepro100] True on TRANSMIT ERROR TIMEOUT, dancer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | linux/in6.h and net/ndisc.h, Antti Tuominen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [vortex, eepro100] True on TRANSMIT ERROR TIMEOUT, dancer |
| Next by Thread: | Unsent Message Returned to Sender, POSTMASTER |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |