| To: | Julian Anastasov <uli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: IFA_F_NO_NDISC (for vrrp) |
| From: | Jerome Etienne <jetienne@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 9 Jun 2000 12:35:18 -0400 |
| Cc: | Jerome Etienne <jetienne@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andrey Savochkin <saw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.10.10006091926150.22344-100000@linux.tu-varna.acad.bg>; from uli@linux.tu-varna.acad.bg on Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 07:29:48PM +0300 |
| References: | <20000609095319.A921@long-haul.net> <Pine.LNX.4.10.10006091926150.22344-100000@linux.tu-varna.acad.bg> |
| Reply-to: | jetienne@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.0i |
On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 07:29:48PM +0300, Julian Anastasov wrote: > Good luck! IFA_F_NO_NDISC is not a complete solution > for LVS. The "hidden" flag has other semantic and the goal > is to mark part of the local addresses as shared (hidden). > This is different from IFA_F_NO_NDISC. We need to control > which addresses can be announced in the ARP probes too. how do you need to control them ? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: IFA_F_NO_NDISC (for vrrp), Julian Anastasov |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: timers in net/ipv6, kuznet |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: IFA_F_NO_NDISC (for vrrp), Julian Anastasov |
| Next by Thread: | Re: IFA_F_NO_NDISC (for vrrp), Julian Anastasov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |