| To: | jetienne@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: IFA_F_NO_NDISC (for vrrp) |
| From: | Andrey Savochkin <saw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 7 Jun 2000 11:53:49 +0800 |
| In-reply-to: | <20000604180651.A678@long-haul.net>; from "Jerome Etienne" on Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 06:06:51PM |
| References: | <20000604180651.A678@long-haul.net> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello,
On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 06:06:51PM -0400, Jerome Etienne wrote:
> This feature is usefull to support VRRP(rfc2338) which requires
> to answer the ARP request for a 'virtual ip' with the proper
> 'virtual MAC'(rfc2338 section 8.2). So to potentially answer
> a particular MAC for a particular IP, and not with the primary
> MAC. As far as i know, it is currently impossible because linux
> assumes to have a single MAC per physical interface. My plan is
> to prevent the kernel from answering for the virtual ip addresses
> and to answer from userspace.
Keeping the policy decision in user-space is a wise solution.
But you may just set NOARP flag for the device and do all the stuff in
user-land merging your 'virtual MAC' logic with any ARP daemon.
Best regards
Andrey V.
Savochkin
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 802.1q Was (Re: Plans for 2.5 / 2.6 ???, Andrey Savochkin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Support for many devices in the kernel (Was 802.1q), Ben Greear |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] IFA_F_NO_NDISC (for vrrp), Jerome Etienne |
| Next by Thread: | Re: IFA_F_NO_NDISC (for vrrp), Jerome Etienne |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |