netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 802.1q Was (Re: Plans for 2.5 / 2.6 ???

To: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: 802.1q Was (Re: Plans for 2.5 / 2.6 ???
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2000 11:36:11 -0400
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 02 Jun 2000 08:06:04 EDT." <Pine.GSO.4.20.0006020741140.13652-100000@shell.cyberus.ca>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> "jamal" == jamal  <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
    jamal> On Thu, 1 Jun 2000, Michael Richardson wrote:

    >> 
    >> >>>>> "jamal" == jamal  <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
    jamal> What is the specific reason that you insist on mapping a VLAN 
    >> 
    >> It is a nice abtraction. It has known interfaces (ifconfig, 
netstat,route).
    >> 

    jamal> hope my comments above answer this.

  Nope... you talk a lot about internal data structures. That's nice, but so
what? I want to know what the userland interface is.

   :!mcr!:            |  Solidum Systems Corporation, http://www.solidum.com
   Michael Richardson |For a better connected world,where data flows faster<tm>
 Personal: http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/People/Michael_Richardson/Bio.html
        mailto:mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx       mailto:mcr@xxxxxxxxxxx



  

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>