| To: | andrewm@xxxxxxxxxx (Andrew Morton) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: tx_timeout and timer serialisation |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Fri, 26 May 2000 22:56:44 +0400 (MSK DST) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <392DB53B.2EB21297@uow.edu.au> from "Andrew Morton" at May 25, 0 11:20:27 pm |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > I posted a patch to the async del_timer() behaviour onto linux-kernel > yesterday. > > I think we need to change the default behaviour of del_timer() to be > async, and then run around and fix the resulting deadlocks. If we accept > anything less, we have tens or even hundreds of subtle bugs. > > I'd be very interested in your opinions. Seems, I like this. 8) Only I still do not undertsnad how it works. 8) I am lost in these patches... Could you prepare one large patch doing all of the described things? Alexey |
| Previous by Date: | tap devices, ddp, multicast, Olaf Hering |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: ICMPv6 Echo Reply bug in Linux 2.2.15 ?, Thomas Moestl |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: tx_timeout and timer serialisation, Andrew Morton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: tx_timeout and timer serialisation, Andrew Morton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |