| To: | andrewm@xxxxxxxxxx (Andrew Morton) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: tx_timeout and timer serialisation |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Fri, 26 May 2000 20:17:24 +0400 (MSK DST) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx (Dave Miller) |
| In-reply-to: | <392DB5BE.9841537F@uow.edu.au> from "Andrew Morton" at May 25, 0 11:22:38 pm |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > I posted a patch to the async del_timer() behaviour onto linux-kernel > yesterday. I'll look now. > To use refcounting we need a new sort of timer, so the timer core can > manage their storage. Khm... Well, it is really universal solution, but I am not sure in its impact to performance. It looks as redundancy... Alexey |
| Previous by Date: | Re: tx_timeout and timer serialisation, Andrew Morton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: ICMPv6 Echo Reply bug in Linux 2.2.15 ?, kuznet |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: tx_timeout and timer serialisation, Andrew Morton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: tx_timeout and timer serialisation, Rusty Russell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |