| To: | pb@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Bieringer) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Q: 2.2.15 default behavior for IPv4 source address selection |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Sat, 6 May 2000 17:48:52 +0400 (MSK DST) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3.0.6.32.20000505224541.008d3940@mail.bieringer.de> from "Peter Bieringer" at May 6, 0 01:13:05 am |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > Basic IP is: > eth0: x.y.z.62 .... > should have source IP address of "eth0" (*.62). My thoughts are the same. > Unfortunately, they uses "eth0:3" (*.58). Really? Well, delete it then and look what will occur. 8) > Is it able to control upper written behavior by default (/proc ?)? I.e. all > outgoing packets without any special binds are using the one of "eth0"? The rules are described in one of appenices to ip-cref from iproute2. Alexey |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Q: 2.2.15 default behavior for IPv4 source address selection ICMP/UDP on multi-alias host, Peter Bieringer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: TCP_RTO_MAX: 120 --> 240, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Q: 2.2.15 default behavior for IPv4 source address selection ICMP/UDP on multi-alias host, Peter Bieringer |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Q: 2.2.15 default behavior for IPv4 source address selection ICMP/UDP on multi-alias host, Richard Jørgensen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |