Re: neighbour cache vs. invalid addresses

["James R. Leu" <jleu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, Apr 30, 2000 at 12:30:35AM +0200, Werner Almesberger wrote:
> James R. Leu wrote:
> > Broadcast and multicast do have defined meanings on CLIP interfaces,
> > mapping this meaning to the neigh_table is where the problem comes in.
> 
> RFC1577 and (RFC2225 update of 1577) have little encouragement for
> multicast (section 8 or 10) and make a rather fuzzy statement about
> broadcast (section 7 or 9).
> 
> You probably mean MARS, RFC2022. That's a different story.

I was actually thinking of the way Cisco handles broadcast and multicast
over static point-to-point or point-to-multipoint ATM sub interfaces.

<snip>

> It's more on how to make it fail gracefully :-)

So does this mean there isn't any talk of adding this support?

Jim

-- 
James R. Leu