| To: | johans@xxxxxxxx (Johan van Selst) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Strange IPv6 fragmentation |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Thu, 2 Mar 2000 22:02:40 +0300 (MSK) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20000302140640.A1859@panther.zwoel.org> from "Johan van Selst" at Mar 2, 0 04:13:13 pm |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > behaviour. Is there any reason why Linux sends fragments in this order? It used to be the most efficient one with Linux defragmenter used during 2.1. I remade it about 2.2.0 to make particular order of fragments not so essential, but fragmenter was not updated to look nicer. Well, if this order really confuses some broken software, it is reason to think about changing it. Alexey |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Strange IPv6 fragmentation, Johan van Selst |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: MSG_EOR flag, Henner Eisen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Strange IPv6 fragmentation, Johan van Selst |
| Next by Thread: | Re: MSG_EOR flag, Henner Eisen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |