| To: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: SIOCGIFCONF and IPv6 addresses |
| From: | Hideaki YOSHIFUJI (吉藤英明) <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 23 Feb 2000 22:28:21 +0900 |
| Cc: | sekiya@xxxxxxx, misiek@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200002231217.PAA00760@ms2.inr.ac.ru> |
| References: | <20000223210717L.yoshfuji@cerberus.nemoto.ecei.tohoku.ac.jp> <200002231217.PAA00760@ms2.inr.ac.ru> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
In article <200002231217.PAA00760@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Wed, 23 Feb 2000 15:17:14
+0300 (MSK)), kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx says:
> > KAME seems to have SIOC{AGD}LIFADDR and if_laddrreq{}.
>
> It is strange. KAME is 4.4BSD, which has well-defined
> interface not requiring any additional letters "L" from its birthday.
I've seeked the source code:
It says the interfaces are deprecated, but, literally,
KAME have them.
--
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Web Page: http://www.ecei.tohoku.ac.jp/%7Eyoshfuji/
PGP5i FP: F731 6599 5EB2 BBA7 1515 1323 1806 A96F 5700 6B25
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: sin6_scope_id (Re: SIOCGIFCONF and IPv6 addresses), kuznet |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Ip aliasing and IPv6, Matthew G. Marsh |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: SIOCGIFCONF and IPv6 addresses, kuznet |
| Next by Thread: | Re: SIOCGIFCONF and IPv6 addresses, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |