netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: RFC: PPP over X

To: Henner Eisen <eis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: RFC: PPP over X
From: Mitchell Blank Jr <mitch@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2000 14:30:07 -0800
Cc: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, axboe@xxxxxxx, Mark Spencer <markster@xxxxxxxxx>, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>, Marc Boucher <marc@xxxxxxx>, paulus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Michal Ostrowski <mostrows@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ben LaHaise <bcrl@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <ouemao6eqh.fsf@baty.hanse.de>; from eis@baty.hanse.de on Mon, Feb 07, 2000 at 07:37:26PM +0100
References: <Pine.GSO.4.20.0002021030520.22723-100000@shell.cyberus.ca> <20000203120127.J72648@sfgoth.com> <ouemao6eqh.fsf@baty.hanse.de>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Henner Eisen wrote:
> >>>>> "Mitchell" == Mitchell Blank <mitch@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>     Mitchell> ...PPTP, ISDN-PPP (is that using the new ppp_generic
>                                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> No, isdn_ppp is the second oldest ppp implementation in the linux kernel
> (since 1.3.x, don't know x by heart). That was long before ppp_generic
> was available (2.3.x).

Yes, but I was wondering if it had been updated to the ppp_generic
regime.  After all async PPP is older still and it uses ppp_generic now :-)

BTW, sorry I didn't get around to posting patches to pppd yesterday.
Every time I thought I nailed the "last thing" in pppd a couple more would
pop up.  I think I'm nearing the end of the tunnel though, so stay
tuned.

-Mitch

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>