| To: | neal@xxxxxxxxx (Neal Cardwell) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: external static routes to local interfaces |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Sat, 8 Jan 2000 15:58:41 +0300 (MSK) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.BSF.4.10.10001061332460.92859-100000@zeno.ffnet.com> from "Neal Cardwell" at Jan 7, 0 01:13:06 am |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > But despite this routing table, packets bound for <A> do *not* go to the > gateway, but rather through the loopback interface. > > Is this a bug or a feature? How do i do this in Linux? It is overriden by route, which is invisible with "route". You may delete it with "ip route" but you will not achieve desired result in any case. To summarize, it is impossible. System has single route for each destination, so that deleting loopback route will route packets to the place, which you ordered, but packets will _not_ be accepted locally. Alexey |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | ip_statistics bug in Linux 2.0/2.2/2.3 TCP?, Neal Cardwell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | ARP request with incorrect (?) source IP, Petri Mattila |
| Previous by Thread: | external static routes to local interfaces, Neal Cardwell |
| Next by Thread: | ip_statistics bug in Linux 2.0/2.2/2.3 TCP?, Neal Cardwell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |