netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [HELP] Packet scheduler

from [Andi Kleen] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Hanak David <dhanak@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [HELP] Packet scheduler
From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 1999 15:29:58 +0100
Cc: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, IP Networking <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <dueaenkfl55.fsf@kempelen.iit.bme.hu>; from Hanak David on Thu, Dec 09, 1999 at 11:45:10AM +0100
References: <dueaenkfl55.fsf@kempelen.iit.bme.hu>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx 
On Thu, Dec 09, 1999 at 11:45:10AM +0100, Hanak David wrote:
> My question is: what should I add to avoid this?  Is a pair of
> start_bh_atomic() end_bh_atomic() calls missing?  What should be
> protected with these functions at all?  (And what needn't?)

Allocate memory only with the GFP_ATOMIC flag.


-Andi
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [HELP] Packet scheduler, kuznet
Next by Date:  socket in c++, Hector Yuen
Previous by Thread:  Re: [HELP] Packet scheduler, kuznet
Next by Thread:  socket in c++, Hector Yuen
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]