Some query on ingress policing

To:	netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Some query on ingress policing
From:	Chetan Kumar <shivakumar.chetan@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 17 Feb 2005 06:02:29 +0530
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=nfvlNy9Vce/IgGnMR4aLDJtLXUnUZlcx3bh4v83o9JDyRd+9Hclt8TQxoh2uJ2lC274fkGzlMou7ov9tonUFothxh0mtDbApaBA2VDk/SpnnyUmHUHPj1knu1/Uc/43fpl/+51MDHYOEQ685aF/JvAmL3QEGLho5d2dBqza6BPc=
In-reply-to:	<17fe83cb0502160349a4190d1@mail.gmail.com>
References:	<17fe83cb0502160349a4190d1@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to:	Chetan Kumar <shivakumar.chetan@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

Hi List,
It is really appreciable, if one of you can clarify me on this issue.

I was going thro the packet journey thro the network stack in Linux.
Now if I want enable ingress policing, it looks like packet
classification and policing should happen in netif_rx (i.e in the
interrupt context) before packet is queued on to the input queue am I
missing something.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Some query on ingress policing, Chetan Kumar <= Re: Some query on ingress policing, Asim Shankar Re: Some query on ingress policing, Chetan Kumar

Previous by Date:	[PATCH 3/3] r8169: Jumbo Frames maximum size increase, Jon Mason
Next by Date:	[2.6.10] Known bug ? TCP Ack "storm", Mark Smith
Previous by Thread:	[PATCH 3/3] r8169: Jumbo Frames maximum size increase, Jon Mason
Next by Thread:	Re: Some query on ingress policing, Asim Shankar
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]