| To: | Simon Kirby <sim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Route cache performance |
| From: | Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 24 Aug 2005 05:50:11 +0200 |
| Cc: | Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Dumazet <dada1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050824000158.GA8137@netnation.com> |
| References: | <20050815213855.GA17832@netnation.com> <43014E27.1070104@cosmosbay.com> <20050823190852.GA20794@netnation.com> <17163.32645.202453.145416@robur.slu.se> <20050824000158.GA8137@netnation.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Simon Kirby writes:
> Something is definitely broken here. Are the interrupts (or in this
> case, NAPI) able to starve the gc somehow?
Hmm no in 2.6 dst entries are freed via RCU callback this had problems
but was redesigned.
Reading your old email... Didn't you get "dst cache overflow" before
2.6.11-bk2?
In other case I like to have your detailed setup to see if I get any
idea or possible can reproduced.
Cheers.
--ro
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: mv643xx(2/20): use MII library for PHY management, Benjamin Herrenschmidt |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Route cache performance, Simon Kirby |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Route cache performance, Simon Kirby |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Route cache performance, Simon Kirby |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |