| To: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [BUG] overflow in net/ipv4/route.c rt_check_expire() |
| From: | Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 3 Apr 2005 21:36:52 +0200 |
| Cc: | Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Dumazet <dada1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050402193224.GA25157@gondor.apana.org.au> |
| References: | <E1DHdsP-0003Lr-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au> <424E641A.1020609@cosmosbay.com> <16974.41648.568927.54429@robur.slu.se> <20050402193224.GA25157@gondor.apana.org.au> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Herbert Xu writes:
> Incidentally we should change the way the rehashing is triggered.
> Instead of doing it regularly, we can do it when we notice that a
> specific hash chain grows beyond a certain size.
> The idea is that if someone is attacking our hash then they can
> only do so by lengthening the chains. If they're not doing that
> then even if they knew how to attack us we don't really care.
Well I don't see how we detect the need for rehash just be looking
at the hash chains. How does the the "lengthening" look like that
are allowed to trigger a rehash?
Agree with Dave that we can increase the interval to start with.
--ro
|
| Previous by Date: | pktgen problem (skb refcount) in 2.6.12-rc1, Robert Olsson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Problem using HTB, Thomas Graf |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [BUG] overflow in net/ipv4/route.c rt_check_expire(), Robert Olsson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [BUG] overflow in net/ipv4/route.c rt_check_expire(), Herbert Xu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |