| To: | jeremy.guthrie@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: V2.4 policy router operates faster/better than V2.6 |
| From: | Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:11:05 +0100 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <200501061546.32116.jeremy.guthrie@berbee.com> |
| References: | <200501031455.26980.jeremy.guthrie@berbee.com> <200501061520.02362.jeremy.guthrie@berbee.com> <16861.44870.968343.578778@robur.slu.se> <200501061546.32116.jeremy.guthrie@berbee.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Jeremy M. Guthrie writes:
> > I don't follow...
> Technically by turning off NAPI, I have 'solved' my short term packet loss
> problem.
You need NAPI of course just wait until your packet load increases just
a little bit... I saw drops in your 2.4 /proc/net/softnet_stat which
indicates you are close to your system performance. With NAPI you keep
up your system system performance regardless of incoming load.
The e1000 driver has some bugs in "your setup" as it enables irq's when
there is only RX and no TX and should have irq's disabled. I sent patch
to intel.
--ro
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Steps for netdev-2.6 inclusion?, James Ketrenos |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: V2.4 policy router operates faster/better than V2.6, Jeremy M. Guthrie |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: V2.4 policy router operates faster/better than V2.6, Jeremy M. Guthrie |
| Next by Thread: | Re: V2.4 policy router operates faster/better than V2.6, Jeremy M. Guthrie |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |