| To: | Pasi Sjoholm <ptsjohol@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: ksoftirqd uses 99% CPU triggered by network traffic (maybe RLT-8139 related) |
| From: | Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:24:01 +0200 |
| Cc: | Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, H?ctor Mart?n <hector@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <brad@xxxxxxxxxx>, <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0407271710070.3787-100000@silmu.st.jyu.fi> |
| References: | <16646.14381.740376.204381@robur.slu.se> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0407271710070.3787-100000@silmu.st.jyu.fi> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Pasi Sjoholm writes:
> Yeah, when the ksoftirqd is taking all the cpu it will be like that, but
> when the kernel is behaving normally the starving diff is between 0->1sec.
Well ksoftirqd makes your kernel load just visible which is good and
ksofirqd gets accounted for this when softirq's get deferred to it.
It may look like goes from 0 to 100% but thats probably not the case.
The problem is we can starve userland at high loads. As said we were
trying some way to cure this I may have some old patch if you like to try.
Cheers.
--ro
|
| Previous by Date: | [BK PATCHES] 2.6.x prism54 fixes, Jeff Garzik |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: ksoftirqd uses 99% CPU triggered by network traffic (maybe RLT-8139 related), Pasi Sjoholm |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: ksoftirqd uses 99% CPU triggered by network traffic (maybe RLT-8139 related), Pasi Sjoholm |
| Next by Thread: | Re: ksoftirqd uses 99% CPU triggered by network traffic (maybe RLT-8139 related), Pasi Sjoholm |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |