| To: | Pasi Sjoholm <ptsjohol@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: ksoftirqd uses 99% CPU triggered by network traffic (maybe RLT-8139 related) |
| From: | Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:10:37 +0200 |
| Cc: | Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, H?ctor Mart?n <hector@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <brad@xxxxxxxxxx>, <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0407270304570.11416-100000@silmu.st.jyu.fi> |
| References: | <16645.34772.760879.146784@robur.slu.se> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0407270304570.11416-100000@silmu.st.jyu.fi> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Pasi Sjoholm writes:
> First run:
> timestamp diff = 0, maxlat = 4581159
Yes you starved your user apps for ~5 sec.
Any idea where your load comes from? Pure NFS network load cannot be hard.
Cheers.
--ro
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: ksoftirqd uses 99% CPU triggered by network traffic (maybe RLT-8139 related), Pasi Sjoholm |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Fragment ID wrap workaround (read-only, untested)., Olaf Kirch |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: ksoftirqd uses 99% CPU triggered by network traffic (maybe RLT-8139 related), Pasi Sjoholm |
| Next by Thread: | Re: ksoftirqd uses 99% CPU triggered by network traffic (maybe RLT-8139 related), Pasi Sjoholm |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |