| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: status of ipchains in 2.6? |
| From: | David Mosberger <davidm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 28 Oct 2003 11:25:10 -0800 |
| Cc: | davidm@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20031028095747.2cdb57e7.davem@redhat.com> |
| References: | <200310280127.h9S1RM5d002140@napali.hpl.hp.com> <20031028015032.734caf21.davem@redhat.com> <16286.44522.275791.73904@napali.hpl.hp.com> <20031028095747.2cdb57e7.davem@redhat.com> |
| Reply-to: | davidm@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
>>>>> On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 09:57:47 -0800, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> said:
David> On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 09:56:58 -0800 David Mosberger
David> <davidm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>>>> On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 01:50:32 -0800, "David S. Miller"
>> <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> said:
>> $ fgrep -i ipchain MAINTAINERS
David> Try netfilter, ipchains is a part of netfilter.
I took ipchains not being mentioned in MAINTAINERS as a sign that
nobody wanted to hear bug reports about it, hence my choice of lkml.
Perhaps you prefer to flame people rather than making it easier
for them to find the right mailing-list?
--david
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [2.6.0-test-9] natsemi oops, Manfred Spraul |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] Updated 8139too with NAPI, Stephen Hemminger |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: status of ipchains in 2.6?, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: status of ipchains in 2.6?, Martin Josefsson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |