| To: | jc <jchapman@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | NAPI poll: why not consider transmit cleanup work before exiting poll mode? |
| From: | Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 24 Aug 2003 10:20:20 +0200 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1061708224.3f4861c063706@webmail.katalix.com> |
| References: | <1061708224.3f4861c063706@webmail.katalix.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
jc writes:
Hello!
> Why don't NAPI drivers consider transmit completion work before doing
> netif_rx_complete() and re-enabling interrupts?
Well if you see benefits it's worth a test. I think some variant was tested.
Did we run into problem when all interrupts disappeared? Make a patchlet
for e1000 I'll give this a try in our setup.
Any experimental data from your tests?
> Is this breaking NAPI rules?
No it shouldn't.
Cheers.
--ro
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | UDP receive path: is this safe?, devnetfs |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Tigon3 driver update, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | NAPI poll: why not consider transmit cleanup work before exiting poll mode?, jc |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] Tigon3 driver update, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |