| To: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: purpose of the skb head pool |
| From: | Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 29 Apr 2003 15:11:38 +0200 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, davem@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030429130317.GA32212@Wotan.suse.de> |
| References: | <20030429135506.A22411@lst.de> <20030429130317.GA32212@Wotan.suse.de> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Andi Kleen writes:
> AFAIK it wasn't removed because the "extreme routing" people
> like Jamal and Robert O. still saw small advantages, but it's
> probably worth rebenchmarking.
:-)
Do we need a test run without Manfreds (soon coming) magazine patch too?
Cheers.
--ro
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | purpose of the skb head pool, Robert Olsson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: purpose of the skb head pool, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: purpose of the skb head pool, Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: purpose of the skb head pool, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |