| To: | Jason Lunz <lunz@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Fwd: [E1000] NAPI re-insertion w/ changes] |
| From: | Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 28 Mar 2003 19:43:22 +0100 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <slrnb891ov.mf8.lunz@stoli.localnet> |
| References: | <16003.11449.497905.815776@robur.slu.se> <slrnb86c3g.7vo.lunz@stoli.localnet> <16004.1914.582979.278009@robur.slu.se> <slrnb891ov.mf8.lunz@stoli.localnet> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Jason Lunz writes: > Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx said: > > Can you test the patch I sent for 5.0.43 with your equipment/setup? > > We have a winner! I called the driver with your patch 5.0.43-k1-ro1. I > also removed all the cyclesoak lines; all they really show is that > throughput is really sensitive to how much CPU time ksoftirqd gets. > > http://gtf.org/lunz/linux/net/perf/ is still the url. Excellent! We have a flat performance curve at ~350 kpps at any load and packet size again. Of course this can be improved further. I think Intel still did the hard work but left the "fine" tuning and testing for us. :-) I guess we propose the patch to maintainers. Cheers --ro |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Fwd: [E1000] NAPI re-insertion w/ changes], Jason Lunz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [BK/GNU] net driver fixes and such, Jeff Garzik |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Fwd: [E1000] NAPI re-insertion w/ changes], Jason Lunz |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] IPSec: IPv6 source address not set correctly in xfrm_state, Tom Lendacky |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |