| To: | Ra Chen <Ra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: obvious ndisc.c bug |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 19 Apr 2001 21:29:04 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | "'netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx'" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <92C0C0AC8AE8D411864300105A835CBB50A5B4@stslex.siemens.com.tw> |
| References: | <92C0C0AC8AE8D411864300105A835CBB50A5B4@stslex.siemens.com.tw> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> I think a multicast packet is a packet with multicast destination address. > Am I wrong? > It's impossible for a source address to be multicast, right? > Where's the "similar code"? As I noticed line 1015 and 1043 both check > "daddr" for being multicast. You're right, I've made the change. Later, David S. Miller davem@xxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Linux Diffserv] scheduler, Werner Almesberger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Proble with sit0 (sit.c), Gilles Diribarne |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: obvious ndisc.c bug, Ra Chen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: obvious ndisc.c bug, Peter Bieringer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |