| To: | Ra Chen <Ra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: obvious ndisc.c bug |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 19 Apr 2001 14:06:14 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <92C0C0AC8AE8D411864300105A835CBB50A5B1@stslex.siemens.com.tw> |
| References: | <92C0C0AC8AE8D411864300105A835CBB50A5B1@stslex.siemens.com.tw> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Ra Chen writes: > net/ipv6/ndisc.c in kernel 2.4.3 > line 1076: > > if ((ipv6_addr_type(saddr)&IPV6_ADDR_MULTICAST) && > > "saddr" should be "daddr". This code looks correct to me, what exactly makes you think it should be testing "daddr"? Similar code above for the solication cases also checks "saddr" for being multicast. Later, David S. Miller davem@xxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: pmtu discovery [PATCH], kuznet |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: obvious ndisc.c bug, Ra Chen |
| Previous by Thread: | obvious ndisc.c bug, Ra Chen |
| Next by Thread: | RE: obvious ndisc.c bug, Ra Chen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |