| To: | Andrew Morton <andrewm@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: zerocopy changes in 3c59x.c |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 26 Jan 2001 05:26:18 -0800 (PST) |
| Cc: | Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <3A717B44.82C66152@uow.edu.au> |
| References: | <3A716447.CF6E8BB0@uow.edu.au> <3A714788.82C064BD@uow.edu.au> <14961.24733.869800.77633@pizda.ninka.net> <14961.30181.671982.174763@pizda.ninka.net> <3A717B44.82C66152@uow.edu.au> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Andrew Morton writes: > tells us that 54 packets have been sent with h/w checksums and this: > > tells us that they were all multi-fragment. > > I assume this is because the IP header is in a different frag? Right, the headers are all in the skb->data buffer and the application data sits in the SKB frags. > Is there ever a situation in which these numbers will differ? If we allowed SG without hw csumming, for example :-) It would let us identify such devices by just asking the user for a statistics dump which gathering debug information. Later, David S. Miller davem@xxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: zerocopy changes in 3c59x.c, Andrew Morton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: zerocopy changes in 3c59x.c, Andrew Morton |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: zerocopy changes in 3c59x.c, Andrew Morton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: zerocopy changes in 3c59x.c, Andrew Morton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |