| To: | Maillist netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | IPv6+2.4.x: ipv6_local_port_range implementation plans + netfilter6 |
| From: | Peter Bieringer <pb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 02 Jun 2001 11:03:24 +0200 |
| Cc: | Maillist linux-ipv6 <linux-ipv6@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Maillist USAGI-users <usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hi all, are there any plans to implement "ipv6_local_port_range" in the future like on IPv4? BTW: for all the IPv6 freaks and kernel 2.4 users: I've already brought netfilter6 on my gateway server up to life (thanks to netfilter & ext3 developers) and add some hints in my HowTo relating to this: http://www.bieringer.de/linux/IPv6/IPv6-HOWTO/IPv6-HOWTO-8.html netfilter6 is currently not fullfeatured and work in progress, but packet filtering works and for security issues it's really better than nothing! I recommend to insert following rules on (tunnel) interface(s) to block incoming TCP connections requests like: ip6tables -I INPUT -i sit+ -p tcp --syn -j DROP ip6tables -I FORWARD -i sit+ -p tcp --syn -j DROP Modify the "-i" option, if your interface(s) to the global IPv6 network are named different.
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] support for Cobalt Networks (x86 only) systems (for, Bogdan Costescu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] support for Cobalt Networks (x86 only) systems (forrealthis, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: removing ip aliases, Harald Welte |
| Next by Thread: | Re: IPv6+2.4.x: ipv6_local_port_range implementation plans + netfilter6, Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |