--On Sunday, June 03, 2001 01:29:42 PM +0200 Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx>
wrote:
On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 11:03:24AM +0200, Peter Bieringer wrote:
Hi all,
are there any plans to implement "ipv6_local_port_range" in the
future like on IPv4?
The IPv4 sysctl is shared between IPv4 and IPv6, because v4 and v6
share a common port space.
Thanks for reply.
Two more questions:
1) exists there any documentation beside the source code itself which
"/proc/sys/net/ipv4" values will be also used for IPv6?
2) are there any plans for 2.5 or later to split off common used proc
switches to another directory like "/proc/sys/net/ip"? There was a
thread sometimes ago relating 'howto make IPv4 as module' which can
be take advantage of such split off (I'm thinking about IPv6 only
clients with Linux network stack)...
TIA,
Peter
|