| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 03 Jun 2005 16:23:25 -0400 |
| Cc: | mitch.a.williams@xxxxxxxxx, john.ronciak@xxxxxxxxx, jdmason@xxxxxxxxxx, shemminger@xxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx, ganesh.venkatesan@xxxxxxxxx, jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1117827650.6071.59.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| Organization: | unknown |
| References: | <1117765954.6095.49.camel@localhost.localdomain> <Pine.CYG.4.58.0506030929300.2788@mawilli1-desk2.amr.corp.intel.com> <1117824150.6071.34.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050603.120126.41874584.davem@davemloft.net> <1117827650.6071.59.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 2005-03-06 at 15:40 -0400, jamal wrote: > On Fri, 2005-03-06 at 12:01 -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > > I think you are more than likely right. If we can instrument it Mitch > could check it out. Mitch would you like to try something that will > instrument this? I know i have seen this behavior but it was when i was > playing with some system that had a real small HZ. > Sorry, Its already there as Dave said in his email. Look for time_squeeze. Its the column i labeled XXXX below. ----- $ cat /proc/net/softnet_stat 0000f938 00000000 XXXXXXX 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 ------ cheers, jamal |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH]: Tigon3 new NAPI locking v2, Jeff Garzik |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch, Mitch Williams |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |