| To: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: PATCH: rtnetlink explicit flags setting |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 28 May 2005 12:00:41 -0400 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050528121827.GQ15391@postel.suug.ch> |
| Organization: | unknown |
| References: | <20050527125010.GO15391@postel.suug.ch> <1117202331.6383.39.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050527141320.GQ15391@postel.suug.ch> <1117206091.6383.73.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050527151913.GA15391@postel.suug.ch> <1117209466.6383.106.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050527165935.GC15391@postel.suug.ch> <1117242749.6251.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050528012810.GN15391@postel.suug.ch> <1117244893.6251.41.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050528121827.GQ15391@postel.suug.ch> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sat, 2005-28-05 at 14:18 +0200, Thomas Graf wrote: > I wanted to have some time for testing today without the need > to resubmit the patches. ;-> > fair enough ;-> > I just tested both patches for about 30 minutes. Everything OK. Feel > free to apply the patches. We have another problem. What tree is this against? Both patches have failures patching against latest davem and linus git trees. I am kind of distracted right now but I could fix this later. cheers, jamal |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] r8169: support restricting speed+duplex in autonegotiation, Francois Romieu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: PATCH: rtnetlink explicit flags setting, Thomas Graf |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: PATCH: rtnetlink explicit flags setting, Thomas Graf |
| Next by Thread: | Re: PATCH: rtnetlink explicit flags setting, Thomas Graf |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |