| To: | Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 27 May 2005 20:56:26 -0400 |
| Cc: | Mitch Williams <mitch.a.williams@xxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx, "Ronciak, John" <john.ronciak@xxxxxxxxx>, "Venkatesan, Ganesh" <ganesh.venkatesan@xxxxxxxxx>, "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20050527140132.1435132d@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net> |
| Organization: | unknown |
| References: | <Pine.CYG.4.58.0505261406210.2364@mawilli1-desk2.amr.corp.intel.com> <20050527085055.79da3d75@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net> <Pine.CYG.4.58.0505271305590.2148@mawilli1-desk2.amr.corp.intel.com> <20050527140132.1435132d@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 2005-27-05 at 14:01 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > Why not just allow adjusting dev->weight via sysfs? I think that should be good enough - and i thought your patch already did this. Adding a shift to the weight in a _weighted_ RR algorithm does sound odd. cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [IPSEC] Add XFRMA_SA/XFRMA_POLICY for delete notification, jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] [NETLINK] Correctly set NLM_F_MULTI without checking the pid, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch, Stephen Hemminger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch, Mitch Williams |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |