| To: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: PATCH: rtnetlink explicit flags setting |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 27 May 2005 09:58:51 -0400 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050527125010.GO15391@postel.suug.ch> |
| Organization: | unknown |
| References: | <1117197157.6688.24.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050527125010.GO15391@postel.suug.ch> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 2005-27-05 at 14:50 +0200, Thomas Graf wrote: > > -#define NLMSG_PUT(skb, pid, seq, type, len) \ > +#define NLMSG_NEW(skb, pid, seq, type, len, flags) \ How about introducing NLMSG_NEW and leave NLMSG_PUT where it is? This way we could do incremental updates. If there are not too many of those NLMSG_PUT around, then it shouldnt be an issue. The first change would be definetely on top of the current patch i sent which is well deserved. Lets have Dave swallow my patch then either you or i could make those changes. Sounds reasonable? cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 3/4] [NEIGH] neighbour table configuration and statistics via rtnetlink, jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] baycom_epp.c: Fix compilation with gcc-4.1.0-20050522, Alexey Dobriyan |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: PATCH: rtnetlink explicit flags setting, Thomas Graf |
| Next by Thread: | Re: PATCH: rtnetlink explicit flags setting, Thomas Graf |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |