netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: PATCH: rtnetlink explicit flags setting

To: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: PATCH: rtnetlink explicit flags setting
From: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 09:58:51 -0400
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050527125010.GO15391@postel.suug.ch>
Organization: unknown
References: <1117197157.6688.24.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050527125010.GO15391@postel.suug.ch>
Reply-to: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 2005-27-05 at 14:50 +0200, Thomas Graf wrote:


>  
> -#define NLMSG_PUT(skb, pid, seq, type, len) \
> +#define NLMSG_NEW(skb, pid, seq, type, len, flags) \

How about introducing NLMSG_NEW and leave NLMSG_PUT where it is?
This way we could do incremental updates. If there are not too many of
those NLMSG_PUT around, then it shouldnt be an issue.

The first change would be definetely on top of the current patch i sent
which is well deserved.
Lets have Dave swallow my patch then either you or i could make those
changes. Sounds reasonable?

cheers,
jamal


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>