On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 07:42 -0400, jamal wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-20-05 at 10:39 +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
>
> > I just want to note, that if you want message bus, you require
> > at least oppsite direction, and thus input callback, and
> > either several socket number for each user [kobject, audit, iscsi,
> > xfrm - all they implement what connector already does] or
> > some header and thus parser in input callback, and thus
> > some registration mechanism.
>
>
> But if you are given your own ID, there should no issues, correct?
Yes.
> i.e it will be no different than say rtnetlink. Users would still have
> to subscribe to topics etc, but thats something you already handle.
> IOW, Iam hoping you are not resorting to a single socket with some user
> space mux to do filtering.
Not following, sorry.
Userspace should use the same socket as kernel - my application
previously
obtained it from dmesg and later used ULOG.
> cheers,
> jamal
>
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
Crash is better than data corruption -- Arthur Grabowski
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
|