| To: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: patch: Action repeat |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 05 May 2005 09:06:39 -0400 |
| Cc: | Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20050504145341.GG18452@postel.suug.ch> |
| Organization: | unknown |
| References: | <20050502150632.GM577@postel.suug.ch> <1115207194.7665.109.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050504123157.GA18452@postel.suug.ch> <1115211549.7665.140.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050504132822.GB18452@postel.suug.ch> <1115213600.7665.166.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050504134815.GD18452@postel.suug.ch> <1115214782.7665.184.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050504140540.GE18452@postel.suug.ch> <1115216629.7906.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050504145341.GG18452@postel.suug.ch> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 2005-04-05 at 16:53 +0200, Thomas Graf wrote: > * jamal <1115216629.7906.4.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-05-04 10:23 > > Agreed. So shall we stick then to just make it a global-only? > > As long as we can't find a way to have a well defined local > scope which is both easy to implement and easy to understand > for the user a global-only scope with the ability for the user > to reset the value via the meta action is most reasonable to me. ok - i will wait to see the patches from Patrick out first then do this. Its actually a simple change. cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patch/RFC]: Asynchronous IPsec processing benchmark., jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: oops in ip_rcv, Anton Blanchard |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: patch: Action repeat, Thomas Graf |
| Next by Thread: | Re: patch: Action repeat, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |