| To: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: patch: Action repeat |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 04 May 2005 09:53:02 -0400 |
| Cc: | Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20050504134815.GD18452@postel.suug.ch> |
| Organization: | unknown |
| References: | <20050430215550.GH577@postel.suug.ch> <1114900485.8929.171.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050430235809.GI577@postel.suug.ch> <1115035838.8929.236.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050502150632.GM577@postel.suug.ch> <1115207194.7665.109.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050504123157.GA18452@postel.suug.ch> <1115211549.7665.140.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050504132822.GB18452@postel.suug.ch> <1115213600.7665.166.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050504134815.GD18452@postel.suug.ch> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 2005-04-05 at 15:48 +0200, Thomas Graf wrote: > * jamal <1115213600.7665.166.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-05-04 09:33 > > in skb_clone() and friends. > > Look at CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT in net/core/skbuff.c > > Yes this solves the case for dummy devices etc but how would > this cause a reset on the way from ingress to egress? If the verdict is not to reset, there should be no clearing of those fields from ingress -> egress until the skb is either freed or someone else along the path resets it. Cloning or copying inherits. Am i missing something? cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: patch: Action repeat, Thomas Graf |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: patch: Action repeat, Thomas Graf |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: patch: Action repeat, Thomas Graf |
| Next by Thread: | Re: patch: Action repeat, Thomas Graf |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |