Re: [patch/RFC]: Asynchronous IPsec processing benchmark.

[jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2005-03-05 at 17:38 +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> Here are some numbers:
> 
> ./netperf -l 60 -H gw -t TCP_STREAM -i 10,2 -I 99,5 -- -m 4096 -s 57344
> -S 57344
> 
> TCP STREAM TEST to gw : +/-2.5% @ 99% conf.
> 
> async-ipsec, 10^6bits/sec:  35.42
>  sync-ipsec, 10^6bits/sec:  37.11
> 
> So even with existing timer deferring it is not noticebly slower [about
> 4%].
> 

by "sync" i hope you mean the original code without your change?

The one thing i see in your POC code that may affect numbers a bit is
allocation of struct esp_async every time in the path. Perhaps precreate
a pool of those and then just grab/return to/fro pool; 
BTW, you may need to incr ref counter of x pre-callback and decrement
when done in callback.

> And I think that benefits it provides definitely cost that price and 
> compile time option.

I think Herberts concerns about latency should go away if you really
have some proper crypto hardware. 

cheers,
jamal