| To: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: patch: policy update by id |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 27 Apr 2005 22:29:59 -0400 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20050428022215.GA23517@gondor.apana.org.au> |
| Organization: | unknown |
| References: | <1114602874.7670.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1114604657.7670.22.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1114604826.7670.24.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050427233924.GA22238@gondor.apana.org.au> <1114650816.7663.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050428012135.GA22950@gondor.apana.org.au> <20050428013014.GA23043@gondor.apana.org.au> <1114653140.7663.36.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050428020754.GA23326@gondor.apana.org.au> <1114654832.7663.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050428022215.GA23517@gondor.apana.org.au> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 2005-28-04 at 12:22 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 10:20:32PM -0400, jamal wrote: > > Whats the point of index then? > > So that you can delete policies without specifying the whole selector. > Thats fine - same with get by index. But if i am managing the policies I should be able to specify the indices of choice. The kernel should assign me one when i dont define an index. It should also reject what i pass if it the index is already in use. This is a very standard scheme for managing tables. cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: patch2: del/get byid, Herbert Xu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: patch2: del/get byid, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: patch: policy update by id, Herbert Xu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: patch: policy update by id, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |